In the electrifying arena of professional wrestling, Cody Rhodes' jaw-dropping triumph over Roman Reigns at WrestleMania XL seemed like the perfect setup for endless epic showdowns between two of WWE's biggest stars. But here's where it gets controversial—whispers of backstage friction might just derail any dreams of a rematch sooner than fans could imagine! Stick around as we dive into the juicy details of this unfolding drama, including the history that made these two legends collide and why a third clash might be trickier than ever.
Cody Rhodes capped off his incredible journey with a monumental victory at WrestleMania XL, where he dethroned Roman Reigns in the headlining spectacle to claim the Undisputed WWE Championship. Yet, according to fresh insights, it could be quite a while before these wrestling titans share the ring in opposition once more.
Rhodes and Reigns delivered some of the most unforgettable main events in WWE history, dominating the spotlight at back-to-back WrestleMania extravaganzas—WrestleMania 39 and WrestleMania XL. While countless fans are eagerly calling for a sequel to their high-stakes rivalries, a few obstacles appear to be standing in the way of making that happen.
On the Self Made Pro podcast, wrestling expert Ibou shed light on what he perceives as underlying tensions between the two headliners, complicating the path toward another bout. He explained that within WWE's inner circles, there's a belief that certain individuals aren't keen on putting Roman and Cody on camera together unless it builds toward a guaranteed match. Essentially, someone in the mix is reportedly insisting that they won't appear on-screen with the other unless it leads directly to locking up in the ring.
Ibou elaborated further, noting that at this moment, a third significant encounter between Reigns and Rhodes isn't in the cards. 'The core issue here is a real worry about the risk,' he said. 'Imagine teasing fans with their on-screen chemistry, building up that excitement for a rematch, only to fall short and not deliver. Right now, no Cody versus Roman showdown is on the schedule, and there are plenty of challenges blocking the way.'
To grasp why this feud resonates so deeply, let's rewind to how Rhodes and Reigns etched their names into WWE lore. Rhodes' relentless chase for the WWE Championship against Reigns sparked one of the most profitable rivalries in the company's history, drawing massive crowds and boosting ratings.
Hailing from AEW, Rhodes clinched the 2023 Men's Royal Rumble, securing his spot in the WrestleMania 39 main event. In that Los Angeles showdown, he pushed Reigns—who was embroiled in the groundbreaking Bloodline storyline (think a family-like faction of wrestlers loyal to him)—to the absolute edge. But a shocking twist via external interference led to Rhodes' heartbreaking defeat.
For context, the Bloodline storyline revolves around Reigns' dominance as the Tribal Chief, surrounded by loyal family members and enforcers, creating a narrative of unbreakable power. This feud wasn't just about wrestling moves; it was a masterclass in storytelling that captivated fans worldwide.
The road to redemption proved bumpy for Rhodes. He won the Royal Rumble again the following year, though the original WrestleMania XL main event was slated for Reigns versus The Rock. Fan uproar over that pairing prompted a heel turn for The Rock, transforming him into the formidable 'Final Boss' persona. This shift opened the door for Rhodes to pursue a second chance against Reigns.
Even after teaming up with Seth Rollins and falling short on Night One of WrestleMania XL in a match against The Rock and Reigns, Rhodes bounced back spectacularly. On Night Two, he ended Reigns' legendary title reign in the inaugural Bloodline Rules match—a style where wrestlers can use any means necessary, including weapons, to win, making it a brutal, no-holds-barred affair. That victory marked Rhodes' debut WWE Championship win, and the duo hasn't faced off in a singles contest since.
And this is the part most people miss: why does this delay matter so much? Rematches like this aren't just about settling scores—they're business goldmines, generating hype, merchandise sales, and ticket revenue. But if tensions are real, WWE might be playing it safe to avoid burning out the fanbase. Is this smart strategy or a missed opportunity? We'll leave that for the comments.
Staying up-to-date on the wrestling scene:
Andrade Walks Out Of Event In Tijuana, Mexico (https://www.si.com/fannation/wrestling/andrade-walks-out-of-event-in-tijuana-mexico)
Major Returning WWE Star Announced For John Cena's 'Last Time Is Now' Tournament (https://www.si.com/fannation/wrestling/wwe/major-returning-wwe-star-announced-for-john-cena-s-last-time-is-now-tournament)
PWI Reveals Women's Top 250 List (https://www.si.com/fannation/wrestling/pwi-reveals-women-top-250-list)
Cody Rhodes Net Worth (https://www.si.com/fannation/wrestling/cody-rhodes-net-worth-2024)
Wrestling rivalries like Cody and Roman's often stir heated debates—should WWE prioritize creative storytelling and avoid overexposure, or give the fans what they want with a quick rematch? Some argue that keeping stars apart builds mystery and value, while others say it's just WWE bureaucracy getting in the way of entertainment. What do you think: Is the rumored tension a myth, or is it genuinely holding back one of the greatest feuds in wrestling history? Drop your thoughts in the comments below—do you side with Rhodes' underdog spirit, Reigns' empire-building legacy, or something in between? Let's discuss!
